Showing posts with label neil gaiman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label neil gaiman. Show all posts

Sunday, January 16, 2011

MONA FOMA Day 1 - A Re-Cap In Pictures

Saturday 16th January - Day 1 (In Pictures!)

This is the way the weather looks when you get up at 11am to go see an organist, after being out all night at an Amanda Palmer ninja gig:PERFECT.

This is the place the organ plays; gothic, dark and bellowing, impossibly complex with only the two small hands he touches the keys with. And yet...

PERFECT.

This is the guy who shows you how to cook carrots (and other vegies) the pro way - and lets you try it with various types of wine, in a play off of flavours from creamy and buttery to sharp and solemn.

PERFECT.

This is the only way to sit and enjoy bands in the sun.

PERFECT.

This is the greatest writer alive. He has phenomenal accompaniment for his 70-minute story in Fourplay string quartet, and artwork to match perfectly drawn by the wonderful and humble Eddie Campbell. Oh, and his wife plays too after, and this time she gets the reception she deserves, as she and the Black Sea Gentlemen and Jane Austen Argument blow the wharf in two.

PERFECT.

This is meeting two of your greatest heroes, and actually having a camera, and someone to click it this time, and actually being able to stop and chat and get your copy of 'Who Killed Amanda Palmer' signed, even though it's midnight and they're obviously exhausted.

PERFECT.

This is the sort of thing two amazing people might write in your book if they have only signed a couple, and it's (sort of) their honeymoon and they are very much in love and maybe a little tired.This is it. This is Day 1 of MONA FOMA. This is being surrounded by art, this is being surrounded by artists, this is good beer, this is free entertainment, this is varied and friendly crowds and a shock jolt to the creativity and intelligence of Tasmania. This is only the first day of what is shaping up to be the best festival I've ever been to.

This is perfect.






Wednesday, December 30, 2009

A Quick Word... On James Kennedy's 'Order of Odd Fish'

The Order of Odd-Fish Book Review:
The Order of Odd-Fish by James Kennedy
(2009)






I'm always on the look out for the next big thing. The independent bookshop where I work is unlikely to beat Kmart on price anytime in the next millennium, but what we can beat those pimply shelf stockers on is know-how. With that in mind, my mission recently has been to order in books from America that we might be able to beat the curve on, so that we can feed the world the classics of tomorrow before the conglomerates even open the boxes!

I came across James Kennedy's The Order of Odd Fish when I saw a link to a video which suggested that Mr. Kennedy would be able to prove that he deserved Neil Gaiman's Newbery Medal, and that the aformentioned medal should be forcibly removed from Gaiman and added to Kennedy's own private collection. The clip was eclectic, energetic, furious, and above all, pretty bloody funny. I knew from that moment that I wanted to see this book, so I had it shipped from the other side of the world for my perusal.

Odd Fish is aptly named. Featuring diverse and exciting characters of several different nationalities and species, the novel would be delightful to read aloud, and I intend to test that theory once the opportunity to steal some local children arises. Above all the deliciously inventive characters that cram every corner of the story though, Odd Fish has a delightful, almost classically British sense of humour, that makes every page a delight to read, so that I found myself chuckling softly under my breath at every turn, much to the annoyance of those who made the mistake of choosing to remain in the same room as me.

I won't deny that the book is imperfect, if anything it's almost too crammed with variety, so that I found myself getting lost and confused in parts, finding it hard to remember which of the many characters who appear and disappear is suddenly popping back up. The beginning also struck me as much more punchy than the ending, so that I was never as deeply satisfied in the second half as I was in the first. That said, it's a first novel, and above any faults it shows that Kennedy is a writer of superb creativity and absurdity, and some scenes - such as the one where the Belgian Prankster and Ken Kiang enjoy a tense and revealing dinner party - prove Kennedy's got the important part - talent - already down-pat, and his next book will be a must read.

I thought that strange and delightfully imaginative books like Alice In Wonderland and Hitchhikers Guide... couldn't be written any more without the authors of them being accused of taking various psychotropic cocktails. I am delighted to announce that novels stuffed with the wacky and hilarious are alive and well, and, if in no-one else, they live in James Kennedy.

View more of my reviews on Goodreads >>

Sunday, November 22, 2009

A Quick Word... Who Stole Amanda Palmer?


You know you've made it in the writing business when someone steals your work. Readers, I'm pleased to announce that I've officially had my first instance of intellectual theft!

About 6 Months ago on my Goodreads page, I posted a review of Neil Gaiman and Amanda Palmer's curious and arresting book Who Killed Amanda Palmer? The review was one of the first to hit the internet on the book, and as such it garnered a bit of attention from curious readers. This was compounded when Neil himself said that he liked the review, sparking a new torrent of interest. As you can see here, it's still up at the top of the review pile, and I've been grateful for, and flattered by, the interest.

The review ran as follows:
This book is one of those that is incredibly hard to describe in review form. So lets start with the facts:

1. It's a companion to Amanda Palmer's new CD of the same name.

2. It has words accompanying each of the pictures she has had taken of herself, written by Neil Gaiman.

3. She's dead in all the pictures, different ways and states each time.

So that's the basics, but it leaves me wondering how to describe it to you, if I call it beautiful, it disregards the visceral pictures, the gritty, horrifying pictures of Amanda bloodied in a shopping trolley, or left in a dark alley.

If I say it's horrifying, it denies the superb photography of the book, the cadence of Neil's fitting words, the attention to detail in the pictures, and the shots where Amanda lies serene and peaceful.

The only thing to do then, is describe it as this: spectacularly unique. Combining the lyrics of her latest album, with short stories by Mr. Gaiman, and photos that seem to have been collected over many times and situations, Who Killed Amanda Palmer is both frightening, absorbing, artistic, and just a little fascinating. My personal favourite is the story of the author in the hot-air balloon, where I actually sat amazed at how well the picture and the text sat together as a compliment. It's not a book for everyone, but for Gaiman fans it's a definite read, For Palmer fans it's a sure-bet for a look. And for fans of both - it's an absolute must buy.

What's interesting though, is where this leads next. A friend of mine who read the review and decided to buy the book was surprised by a feeling of deja vu when reading Amazon's product description of the title:

This book is a companion to Amanda Palmer's new CD of the same name. It has words accompanying each of the pictures she has had taken of herself, written by Neil Gaiman. She's dead in all the pictures, different ways and states each time. So that's the basics, but it leaves me wondering how to describe it to you, if I call it beautiful, it disregards the visceral pictures, the gritty, horrifying pictures of Amanda bloodied in a shopping trolley, or left in a dark alley. If I say it's horrifying, it denies the superb photography of the book, the cadence of Neil's fitting words, the attention to detail in the pictures, and the shots where Amanda lies serene and peaceful. The only thing to do then, is describe it as this: spectacularly unique. Combining the lyrics of her latest album, with short stories by Mr. Gaiman, and photos that seem to have been collected over many times and situations, Who Killed Amanda Palmer is both frightening, absorbing, artistic, and just a little fascinating. It's not a book for everyone, but for Gaiman fans it's a definite read, For Palmer fans it's a sure-bet for a look. And for fans of both - it's an absolute must buy.

It's been cut down, but the resemblance is irrefutable and obvious. After email contact by me asking to be acknowledged as the author of the review, Amazon have instead chosen to remove it, but haven't been able to wipe up traces of it on this blog here, and here where Barnes and Noble appear to have stolen the Amazon-edited version, though they did not do me the service of using the whole document, ending mid-sentence:

Combining the lyrics of her latest album, with short stories by Mr. Gaiman, and photos that seem to have been collected over many times and situations, Who Killed Amanda Palmer is both frightening, absorbing, artistic, and just a little fascinating. It'

"It" what Barnes and Noble? Don't leave us in suspense!

Truth is, most of this probably isn't even Amazon's fault. It seems they have taken steps toward more user-generated content and I fully understand that they probably have no idea where many of their product descriptions come from. Truthfully, I don't mind my work being stolen, I could use the help to get my name out there, but if something as simple as attributing the words to their author is too hard for someone who thinks that they're at least good enough to advertise the product with, it stings a little. Although I suggested - and would have much rathered - that Amazon add my name to the review rather than scrapping it altogether, i'm impressed that they did at least change the product description page. It's been interesting to see the way that the words have moved from one place to another as one person 'borrows' from another in a domino-syled fashion. Above all, it's been exciting and thrilling to have my work received with the level of credibility associated with theft. I wonder if this is how the musicians feel...

If you miss this blog, or simply don't like the layout, chances are you'll be able to read it online somewhere else by the end of the week! How exciting!

Sunday, June 14, 2009

A Quick Word... On Scaring Children

I remember once as a kid, going for a holiday drive out to our bush property, and when we got there, finding the windows to the house had been smashed, our farm car had been pretty badly beaten up, and just general damage and destruction had been wreaked right around the place. Nothing had been stolen, but I couldn't settle down for our holiday after seeing what had happened. I was terrified.

I was a pretty impressionable and imaginative kid, and trying to sleep in the house that night was an ordeal that still makes my heart beat a little faster even now when I think about it. Whether it was the fringes of a dream, or merely my own paranoia, I started to hear things outside. The sound of young male laughter. The clank and slosh of a jerry can of petrol. The frantic scratch of a match being lit.

Of course, none of those sounds were out there. Whoever did the damage to the place, and whatever reasons they had to do it, they were done now. But I remained terrified just the same.

Fear in children is a powerful and consuming emotion. Children have very powerful imaginations and capacities for belief. While adult fear often presents itself as nervousness, the fear of a child is very different. It has a potency that is so much more obvious to the observer. A child's eyes in a state of fear are very hard to ignore in the adult realm, nothing gets our paternal instinct going like it. And for that reason it is the suggestion of many adults that we are to avoid scaring children, as it is an emotion they are not capable of handling. But this logic denies both the importance and necessary nature of fear, and more importantly, consequently classifies it as a second-grade emotion, and something to be avoided, rather than responsibly embraced.

I mention the issue because the subject has come up recently We'd been planning an evening pirate session for some time now, and decided that as part of the novelty of doing all the activities in the dark we should have a scary story. We came up with a tale about me being a pirate crew member who is taunted by his captain, and later gets revenge by leaving with the loot and allowing my captain to be captured. It was then that my boss suggested that he play the pirate captain, and make the sounds of a peg leg on the stairs near the room we were running the activities in, and shout that he had come back for what was rightfully his.

I thought we'd gone too far. The kids would be terrified, they wouldn't sleep, they wouldn't come back, the parents would be angry. We should just do the activities in a traditional, non-threatening way, and avoid any potential repercussions. Ironically it was my own fear of consquence that was going to stop me doing it.

My boss was adamant it would make the night worthwhile, so the experiment commenced. Later that night after telling the story, we played a quiet card game and there came a rhythmic thumping, and an eerie cough. The kids laughed for a second. Then the man in the corridor began to cackle and yell that he had come back and taken what was rightfully his. Some kids started running round the room, grabbing things for protection. Others sat there wide-eyed and motionless. The more extreme ones screamed at the top of their lungs, while another young boy clutched onto my coat, crying.

The pirate hobbled away, the pancakes were brought out, and many kids began to speculate as to what the stranger might have looked like. Most bounced back immediately, a few others were still tentative and keen to stay pretty close to the adults.

But none had forgotten it. Nearly a week later the same kids are returning to the shop asking me if I have seen the mysterious visitor since. Some are even still wearing the pirate hats they had on the night. Had we done an ordinary pirate activities night, there would have probably been little that redeemed itself in the children's minds. But the fear of the moment had made the entire night unforgettable.

My boss and I were talking to one of the mothers later about our hard decision of whether to include the scary pirate visitor or not. She turned out to be the mother of the crying boy who had followed me around, hands gripped like a vice on my sleeve. He had not slept well that night, she admits, but five days later is still talking about the experience.

I'm not suggesting for a second that we should pass our toddlers Saw IV on DVD and see what they think, but I am suggesting that fear is as important an emotion as any other, and although we shouldn't overstep the boundaries of being frightened, it is important to occasionally experiment with them.

I have been volunteering to visit and perform a reading of Neil Gaiman's The Graveyard Book to local Primary Schools, and one expressed reluctance with what I believe to be the contention that the book was not suitable for its Grade 6 students, due to its opening paragraph which opens with the line 'There was a hand in the darkness, and it held a knife', and makes it very clear that a family has died in the space just preceding the books opening. The start of the novel is its most frightening part, and although presented with an eye to not being too confronting, sure, it's going to scare a few of the kids. But that fear is useful, by playing with fear in a safe environment, we're teaching kids how to cope with it when they are in an environment that isn't safe. Just as dangerous as a child who takes candy from a stranger, is a child too scared to move, who doesn't run back to mum and dad, but stands there like they have been suddenly frozen in place.

The moment we cover our faces and say "Boo!" to a baby, we are experimenting with fear. A baby laughs obviously, but it laughs as a response to being shocked and surprised. And for some reason we assume that this is the last time a child should feel afraid. But fear is something to be conquered in the long term, something to break down piece by piece and tackle.

Fear is what tells us there is a pirate in the hall, that there is an arsonist outside the bedroom laughing, that there is a monster under the bed. But time and time again we learn that the smartest of souls is not the one that closes their eyes and hopes it all goes away, but the one who bravely turns on the lights, steps outside, and dares to discover the truth.

Gaiman opens his other scary children's book Coraline with a quote from the writer G.K Chesterton: 'Fairytales are more then true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten'. In the same way, fear is not the experience of fright, but the lesson of bravery.

Fear is not there to tell us that the demons and evils of the world lurk around every corner, but instead that even the most terrifying evenutality can be tackled by those that are prepared to take a deep breath and do their best, even against the worst.

If laughter is the expression of feeling released from danger, then fear is the emotion that leads us - from one side to the other - through the danger itself. And for that, it's importance cannot be understated.

Image Source Used By Permission Under Creative Commons License

Thursday, May 14, 2009

A Quick Word... From Neil Gaiman

"There are only two things that any writer is allowed to be obsessed by, and they are love and death. And I think that's a huge, great big, clunking cliché, and like all great big clunking clichés, it's true."
- Neil Gaiman